In every criminal case, you have the right to a trial. If you go to trial, whether you have a jury or you choose to go with a judge, the evidence must show beyond a reasonable doubt that you did commit the crime in order for the jury or judge to convict you. The concept of beyond a reasonable doubt may seem foreign to you if you have never faced criminal charges before. 

According to The American Psychological Association, there are several parts to the definition of beyond a reasonable doubt. First, it is the concept of something courts recognize as the standard of proof in a criminal trial. This just means that it is the level to which the prosecution must prove its case to get a guilty verdict. 

That is the very basic definition and may not provide you with the information that helps you to understand the concept. A better way to define it is that it means the jury or the judge must not be able to find any doubt of your guilt. There should be no way to rationalize that you did not do the crime. 

Finally, it is important to note that reasonable doubt is about being certain you are guilty but does not require the jury or judge to be absolutely certain. So, reasonable doubt does not mean void of any doubt. 

This standard is how your defense team will build your case. They just have to interject doubt into the jurors’ or judge’s mind that you did not commit the crime and show there is another possible explanation. This would provide a rational and justifiable means by which the jury or judge could doubt your guilt, and therefore have to declare you not guilty.